In August of 2000, Dr. Robert W Malone patended the DNA vaccine. In August of 2021, Dr. Malone posted his idealogy on the possible effects of Advanced Development of Disease (ADE) in regard to the COVID-19 mRNA & DNA vaccines on Twitter. In January, 2022, Dr. Malone was banned from Twitter for posting COVID-19 research studies into the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines. Many of the studies reference the risk:reward ratio of the vaccines vs. COVID infection in relationship to immunity.
Dr. Malone had racked up half a million Twitter followers before his account was deactivated, and the event has caused a bit of a stir amongst opponents of COVID vaccination and mandates. The world-renowned researcher and inventor appeared on Joe Rogan’s poscast this month in which he spoke on a multitude of thoughts and beliefs behind vaccination and governmental propaganda.
From the beginning of coronavirus vaccination attempts, the plausibility of ADE has existed with these categories of viruses, as well as others (such as a previous attempt with a RSV vaccine). Such a risk was presented by third party researchers pre & intra-study, and was acknowledged, but not investigated, by Pfizer during their trials, and during their proposal for FDA approval.
Some media outlets have unsuccessfully attempted to discredit Dr. Robert W Malone, despite overwhelming evidence of his credibility.
As one of the most–if not the most–credible sources of DNA/mRNA vaccine information, Dr. Malone has continuously spoken on his beliefs that vaccines should have always remained as encouraged (not forced) for the elderly and at-risk populations. Anything more indents significantly on risk:reward valuation, and is inherently dangerous without proper evaluation of all side effects.
What is ADE / VAED ?
They are two names for nearly the same event. Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE) is the increased severity of disease post-vaccination, due to the introduction of viral antibodies without the proper or equivalent immune response that would occur with natural infection. Vaccine Associated Enhancement of Disease (VAED) is an umbrella term for any mechanism that would cause enhancement of disease severity post-vaccination, including those from antibodies produced. Vaccine Associated Enhancement of Respiratory Disease (VAERD) is exactly what it sounds like. ADE, VAED, and VAERD are the terminologies usually associated with modern-day studies and investigations into the not-fully-understood mechanisms.
Historically, enhancement of disease has been shown in numerous animal models during previous failed vaccination attempts against coronaviruses. This may either occur immediately post-vaccination, to the immediate response of antibody production; or it could occur as immunity wanes over time from a vaccine. It’s possible that both could occur.
In real-world data, an individual is not considered vaccinated until 14 days after their final “jab” (by CDC’s current standards). Statistically, if immediate post-vaccination ADE/VAED is occuring, it may be near-impossible to conclude simply by looking at “deaths among vaccinated versus unvaccinated” as many incidents would be incorrectly categorized as unvaccinated. If the second scenario of ADE/VAED is occuring, during the waning phase, it would also become near-impossible to determine due to the inclusion of secondary shots and boosters, which could continuously hide the “trigger” until the last dose ends (alternatively, we may require boosters for life). Due to these incompatibilities of real-world data in correspondence with theoretical ADE/VAED, the necessity for conclusive safety trials were deemed warranted by many.
Did Pfizer Acknowledge The Risks?
Although it is well known amongst the vaccine medical community the associated risks of ADE/VAED with coronavirus vaccination, Pfizer acknowledged that they did not include any data or studies on the possibility during their request for approval for their COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty, from the FDA. Shockingly, Pfizer acknowledged that they are missing data on VAED, it’s use during pregnancy, or “vaccine effectiveness”. [ 1 | b ]
Pfizer Releases Their Followup
In November 2021, the European Union published Pfizer’s Risk Management Plan. [ 2 | b ] In this release, Pfizer prints it’s intermittent conclusions from the study data so far. The subjects have almost all been innoculated since (subjects were unblinded to receive the vaccine intra-study, further murkying the waters of efficacy and safety in their ongoing trials). As of two months ago, after millions of people have already received Comirnaty, Pfizer acknowledges that they still have no information on the safety of their vaccine in pregnant women, immunocompromised individuals, or the interactions between other vaccines.
However, Pfizer did decide to follow up with the possibility of VAED / VAERD after administration of their vaccine. Before diving into the data, we want to keep in mind a few things. On what is essentially the footnote at the end of the document, Pfizer acknowledges that they only have data on approximately half (50%) of their participants.
We also know that 44,245 participants amongst all referenced studies have received the vaccine.
To put this all together: Pfizer’s Risk Management Plan indicates that 44,245 participants were vaccinated in total. The data included in this study is only up to 2-months post-vaccination, and thus it only includes the participants that did not receive the placebo (before unblinding occured). 22,105 individuals were given a vaccine in the larger study, in which about 50% of the patients are included in the dataset. 96 from the smaller study. So with all of this in mind, we are looking at the data for approximately 11,148 (22,105/2 + 96) participants two months post-vaccination.
The follow up report investigated their findings, looking into the possibility of their COVID vaccine increasing the severity of disease. It was determined that there were 1,261 “serious events”. 612 participants (5.5%) wound up in the hospital within the first two months post-jab. At least 311 participants (2.8%) receiving the vaccine died within the first two months. 288 vaccinated individuals (2.6%) still had severe COVID within two months, one of the key indicators of VAED, or ADE. 33.9% of the severe cases have an unknown outcome, thus possibility raising the mortality rate of Comirnaty from a probable low of 2.8% to a plausible high of 7.1%. In conclusion, Pfizer acknowledges that VAED is possible due to the high incidence of severe COVID and other hospitalizations/deaths post-vaccination.
Considering an estimated 1.4% fatality from COVID-19 infection in the United States [ 4 ], the optimistic mortality rate of 2.8% post-vaccinated doubles the chance of death versus natural infection. This is also not considering the decreasing mortality rate of COVID as the less-deadly but more-infectious Omicron takes over. It also doesn’t take into mind the necessity for additional shots and boosters, in which each subsequential shot will further increase the risks. Finally, it ignores the natural immunity we continue to build in each passing day.
Edit: Giving the unlikely event (however, possible) in which the adverse events reported--including possible signs of VAED--were all within the 50% of patients reported in the dataset, we must thus consider this extreme circumstance. In this rare case, we are looking at reported incidences per 22,201. When account for this plausibility we find that 2.8% of participants were hospitalized, 1.4% of participants died, and 1.3% of participants developed severe COVID. With all statistical possibilities accounted for, we find the Comirnity vaccine has a between a 0% and -507% efficacy against all-cause mortality during the most dangerous surge of the COVID-19 Alpha variant.
Where Do We Go From Here?
The possibility of ADE / VAED was always known, yet always neglected. Released data as per the manufacturer suggests that VAED may be occuring in respect to ongoing studies. Pfizer tells us that they will now investigate further into the possibility, but that is also impossible due to unblinding intra-study (an absurd phenomenon in any study historically-speaking). Real world data is impossible to decipher VAED. It will proove difficult to ever begin a new double-blind study with mandates already underway for some nations. We are too late.
They were warned. They ignored the warnings. Now we suffer. Cases continue to rise exponentially and we continue to be left in the dark, wondering, “What if?” This started as a guessing game, humanity guessed wrong, and so we will continue to live, or die, guessing.